For AEC firms · By AEC insiders

We've written the proposals. Now we build the tools.

Wukanda was founded by engineers and architects who spent a decade watching talented firms lose work to firms with bigger proposal teams. We built the tools we always wished existed.

Read our story
Why it matters who builds your tools
"Why does the AI keep using generic environmental language?"
Because it was built by people who've never read a NEPA document.
"Our proposal software doesn't understand scope categories."
Ours was designed around them.
"The AI tool gives outputs we can't use without rewriting."
Ours is trained on your firm's own language.
12+
Years of combined AEC project experience on the founding team
400+
RFPs and proposals reviewed to design our proposal workflows
3
Disciplines covered: civil, environmental, architecture, with more in development

Why insider knowledge changes everything.

Most AI tools built for AEC firms were designed by software teams who interviewed a few project managers and called it research. The outputs show it, generic language, no understanding of scope categories, no concept of why you always need a subconsultant section.

We come from the other direction. Our team has managed RFP calendars, pulled all-nighters before submission deadlines, and stared at a blank screen trying to write a fresh "Firm Qualifications" section for the twentieth time that quarter. We know what the pain feels like from inside.

That's why our tools handle things like: pulling your best relevant project narratives automatically, flagging compliance gaps in RFP requirements, matching your past cost data to new scope language. Not because we read about it, because we lived it.

📋
Proposal language that sounds like your firm
We configure tools on your own past proposals and qualifications, not generic internet text. The output reads like your best writer, because it's trained on them.
🗂️
Scope structures we already understand
AEC proposals have specific anatomy. Executive summary, scope of work, team qualifications, fee schedule. Our tools know the structure before you tell them.
📐
Built around your delivery methods
Design-build, CM/GC, traditional design. Your tools are configured to your project type mix, not a one-size-fits-all template.
📊
Historical data that actually connects
Past project costs, hours, subconsultant fees, win rates by client type. We connect these to your AI tools so outputs reflect your actual experience.
🔒
Understands what's confidential
We know the difference between shareable qualifications language and fee negotiation history. Tools are configured to surface the right content to the right people.
🤝
Speaks your clients' language
Municipal procurement. Federal agencies. Private developers. Each has different formats, different preferences, different hot-button words. Your tools learn these.
Book a 30-minute call

Talk to someone who speaks AEC.

No sales pitch. A real conversation about where your firm spends the most time and whether we're a fit to help.

Email us instead

We respond within one business day. No automated sequences.